If you're reading this, your FRCS Urol Part 1 is roughly a month away and you're probably somewhere on the spectrum between "quietly confident" and "considering a new career in radiology." I remember that feeling well. I sat Section 1 of the Intercollegiate Specialty Examination in Urology not long ago, and the most useful thing I can share isn't a pep talk — it's the data I had to learn the hard way.

One thing that surprised me looking back: the topics I found hardest turned out to be the same ones most other candidates struggle with too. I can see that now from two angles — my own JCIE feedback sheet, and the aggregate performance of everyone revising on SmashUrology. I'll share both honestly, and then walk through what I'd do with the 33 days you've got left.

My FRCS Urol Part 1 result, broken down

The pass mark for progression to Section 2 was a total of 153.00 — that's the number every candidate is chasing. Here's how mine landed:

I was relieved to pass, but I don't think the headline number is the interesting part. The feedback sheet is where the real value sits. JCIE gives you a topic-by-topic percentage breakdown across both papers, and mine told a story I suspect a lot of you will recognise:

Notice that gap. Even with a comfortable pass, there was a ~18 percentage point spread between my best and worst topics. From talking to colleagues, that kind of spread seems pretty normal — and it tends to be exactly where the exam separates people. Basic science and infection/stones are the classic "I'll get to those last" subjects, which is probably why they catch so many of us out.

What the SmashUrology data shows (129,034 attempts in)

Here's where it gets genuinely useful. We track accuracy by topic across every question attempted on the platform — currently more than 129,000 attempts. When you plot it out, the pattern lines up closely with my own feedback sheet:

Read that chart and a clear order of difficulty emerges. Female & functional urology sits last at 58%. Infection, paediatrics and andrology cluster around 60%. Meanwhile LUTS — the bread-and-butter most of us see every clinic — tops the table at 74%.

Where the data and my own sheet line up — and where they don't

This is the part worth pausing on. My weakest topic (Infection & Stones) is one of the platform's weakest too. But there's an interesting divergence: I happened to score well on Female/Functional at 89.7%, yet it's the single hardest topic for users overall at 58%.

What I take from this is that aggregate weak spots are fairly predictable, and the easiest marks to win are often in the topics most people neglect. If the average candidate is scoring 58% on female and functional urology, then focused revision there tends to move you up the pack faster than grinding the topics you already know well.

Your 33-day plan: spend your time where the marks are

One quick but important caveat before the week-by-week. The chart above is the average across all users — a useful guide if you're starting from scratch. But if you're already revising on SmashUrology, you don't need to guess from the average. Your dashboard gives you a personalised, topic-by-topic breakdown of your own accuracy, and the leaderboard shows you how each of your topics compares to other candidates sitting the same exam. So my honest advice is: use the generic chart below as a backstop, but let your own analytics drive your plan. If your weakest topic is testis rather than infection, revise testis — the platform will tell you exactly where you stand.

Week 1 — start with your red zone

Front-load whatever your personalised analytics flag as lowest. For most people starting cold, that means the sub-60% topics: female & functional, infection, paediatric urology and andrology. These are where the platform average is lowest, so they're where untrained candidates tend to lose the most marks. Work in focused question-bank blocks rather than passive reading — get the urodynamics traces, paediatric UTI algorithms and SUI pathways into long-term memory while you still have runway.

Week 2 — consolidate the amber middle

Bladder, kidney and testis cancer tend to sit in the 61–66% band. The knowledge is usually there; it's the precision that isn't. This is staging, guideline thresholds and management-algorithm territory — the sort of high-yield recall that FRCS flashcards and spaced repetition are genuinely good at locking in. Drill until you can recite the decision points without hesitating.

Week 3 — keep your strong topics sharp

Prostate, urolithiasis and LUTS are where most of us feel safe — but "safe" is where careless errors creep in. Do timed mixed sets to keep these ticking over without over-investing time you can't afford. Glance at your leaderboard position here too; it's a quick reality check on whether "safe" is actually safe.

Final week — exam-condition mocks only

Stop learning new material. Do full timed papers, review every wrong answer, and rebuild your confidence on pacing. The exam tests recall under time pressure as much as knowledge, so it's worth simulating that as closely as you can. If you want a fuller structure, I've written a longer 3-month FRCS revision strategy that this 33-day sprint slots neatly into the back end of.

Why a question bank beats textbooks for FRCS Urol Part 1 at this stage

With a month to go, comprehension probably isn't your main problem — retrieval is. You need to know, quickly and under pressure, which answer is correct. For me, that only really came from doing questions, getting them wrong, understanding why, and doing more. The topic-accuracy data above exists precisely because thousands of candidates are doing exactly that on the SmashUrology question bank — and it's how you find your own blind spots before the examiner does.

Frequently asked questions