These FRCS urology viva tips are written by an ST7 urology registrar who has sat and passed the exam. This guide covers viva structure, EAU and NICE guidelines, answer frameworks, and a week-by-week preparation plan for FRCS (Urol) Part 2 candidates.
How to Pass the FRCS Urology Viva: Top Tips from a Fellow Who's Been There Recently
Founder, SmashUrology · Updated May 2026
The FRCS (Urol) Part 2 viva exam is an exam like no other. There is nowhere to hide — it is you, two examiners, and a series of scenarios designed to test whether you think and reason like a consultant urologist.
I sat the exam as an ST6 urology registrar in 2025. The preparation, the nerves, and — eventually — the relief of passing are all pretty fresh in my memory. That experience is the foundation of SmashUrology, and it is what madee me write every tip in this post.
Whether you are an ST5 registrar sitting for the first time, an ST7 on your final attempt, a Portfolio Pathway candidate, or an international trainee preparing from abroad — this guide is written for you.
Understanding the FRCS (Urol) Part 2 viva format
Before you can prepare effectively, you need to understand exactly what you are walking into.
The Part 2 viva consists of 8 stations, each 20 minutes long. Each station is divided into two 10-minute segments covering different clinical categories. Topics span the full breadth of urology — you should really know these by now.
You will face two examiners per station. They are not trying to fail you. Their job is to probe the boundaries of your clinical reasoning and assess whether it is safe, structured, and consultant-level.
The exam is held twice a year — in summer and winter — and is open to ST5–ST7 urology registrars, Portfolio Pathway candidates, and international candidates meeting the eligibility criteria set by the Joint Committee on Surgical Training (JCST).
Understanding the format matters because it shapes your preparation strategy. Eight stations across broad subspecialties means you cannot afford gaps. You need to be competent across the whole curriculum — not just your clinical comfort zone.
What examiners are actually looking for
This is the most important thing to familiarise yourself with before you sit down to revise: examiners are not looking for perfection — they are looking for safety and structure.
A candidate who says "I would discuss this patient at a specialist MDT before proceeding" scores marks. A candidate who barrels confidently towards the wrong answer does not.
The global rating descriptors used in FRCS viva marking reward candidates who:
- Demonstrate systematic clinical reasoning
- Anchor decisions to evidence-based guidelines
- Recognise the limits of their own knowledge
- Communicate clearly under pressure
- Think and act like a day-one consultant urologist
For a detailed breakdown of how viva stations are scored, read our dedicated post: FRCS Urology Viva Scoring Explained.
How to structure every viva answer
One of the most common mistakes candidates make is diving straight into management without contextualising the case. A clear, consistent answer structure solves this — and signals confidence to examiners even when your knowledge on a topic is not perfect.
Use this framework for every scenario:
- Acknowledge the examiner's prompt — briefly confirm you have understood the case and any key parameters given
- Present the initial answer in a structured manner — age, relevant history, presenting complaint, performance status
- Investigations — what you need and why, in a logical sequence from basic bloods through to staging imaging
- Management — guideline-based, patient-centred, MDT-aware; discuss options and rationale
- Safety-net — follow-up plan, escalation triggers, what to do if the patient deteriorates or does not respond as expected
This structure works for straightforward cases and complex ones alike. When a scenario throws you, defaulting to this framework buys you time to think and keeps your answer coherent for the start of many scenarios.
Practise this structure out loud — ideally with a colleague acting as examiner. The SmashUrology Viva Bank contains over 80 structured scenarios across all major subspecialties, each mapped to current guidelines, so you can drill this framework repeatedly in realistic exam conditions.
Using guidelines confidently in the viva
Guidelines are a super helpful tool in the FRCS viva to bounce on. Candidates who link their answers to evidence consistently score higher than those who rely on anecdote or personal clinical experience alone.
EAU Guidelines are the gold standard across most urological conditions — updated annually and freely available at uroweb.org. Prioritise guidelines for prostate cancer, bladder cancer, upper tract urothelial carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, stone disease, female and functional urology, and male LUTS.
NICE Guidelines are particularly relevant for prostate cancer (NG131), bladder cancer (NG2), and renal cancer (NG143). NICE guidance can diverge from EAU on specific thresholds and referral pathways — know these differences.
A practical tip: when you are uncertain, explicitly name the guideline you are drawing from. "According to EAU guidelines, the recommended approach here would be..." signals to examiners that your answer is evidence-based — and it buys you a moment to collect your thoughts.
You do not need to memorise every figure and table. You do need to know the key recommendations, the strength of evidence behind them, and where EAU and NICE differ on commonly tested conditions.
Handling uncertainty — and turning it into marks
Every candidate will face a question they do not know the answer to. How you handle that moment is what separates good candidates from great ones.
The instinct is to bluff or go quiet. Neither helps. Instead, use uncertainty productively:
"This is a complex case I would want to discuss at our specialist MDT" — appropriate for oncology staging decisions, borderline surgical candidates, and rare presentations.
"I would seek input from a colleague with subspecialty expertise in this area" — valid and mature for highly specialist scenarios.
"I am not certain of the exact figure, but my management would be guided by EAU recommendations which favour..." — shows reasoning even without precise recall.
What you must avoid is stating something confidently that is factually wrong. An examiner will push back, and the recovery is painful. Honest, clinically-framed uncertainty scores far better than confident errors.
Common mistakes candidates make in the FRCS viva
Having sat the exam and helped others prepare for it, these are the patterns that cost candidates marks most often:
The week before your viva — a practical prep plan
The week before the exam is not the time for learning new material. It is the time to consolidate, rehearse, and arrive in the exam room feeling prepared rather than panicked.
Practise with the SmashUrology Viva Suite
SmashUrology was built specifically for UK urology trainees preparing for the FRCS (Urol) — by a registrar who has sat and passed the exam. The Viva Suite includes three tools designed to take you from revision to exam-ready:
Ready to start your viva preparation?
Join hundreds of UK urology trainees using SmashUrology to prepare for the FRCS (Urol) Part 2 — with scenarios, feedback, and tools built by someone who has been through it.